Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 12.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 185 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 96x more pipelines: 2304 vs 24
- 8.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 1042
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 241
- 8.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 4592
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 27.062
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 vs 273.504
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 1.777
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 19.939
- 19.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 31.881
- 8.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 1397
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2227
- 8.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 1397
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2227
- 16.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 vs 62
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 vs 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 vs 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 vs 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 vs 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 vs 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 vs 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 vs 62 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 8827 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 767 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 39028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 116.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 1022.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 9.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 84.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 607.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1380 | 341 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 620 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
