Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- 12.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 185 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 8 GB
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 18 April 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 8 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- 4.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 96x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 24
- 8.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 1042
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 241
- 8.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 4592
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 27.062
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 273.504
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 1.777
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 19.939
- 19.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 31.881
- 8.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 2227
- 8.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 2227
- 16.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 versus 62
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 versus 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 1005 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 341 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 185 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |