Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
  • 12.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 185 Watt
  • 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 8 GB
Date de sortie 1 September 2017 versus 18 April 2017
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt versus 185 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale 32 GB versus 8 GB

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580

  • 4.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 300 MHz
  • Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1150 MHz
  • 96x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 24
  • 8.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 1042
  • 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 241
  • 8.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 4592
  • 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 27.062
  • 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 273.504
  • 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 1.777
  • 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 19.939
  • 19.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 31.881
  • 8.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 1397
  • 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 878
  • Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 2227
  • 8.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 1397
  • 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 878
  • Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 2227
  • 16.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 versus 62
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 1257 MHz versus 300 MHz
Vitesse augmenté 1340 MHz versus 1150 MHz
Pipelines 2304 versus 24
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 8827 versus 1042
PassMark - G2D Mark 767 versus 241
Geekbench - OpenCL 39028 versus 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 116.142 versus 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1022.932 versus 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.235 versus 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 84.034 versus 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 607.721 versus 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11281 versus 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3695 versus 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 versus 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11281 versus 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3695 versus 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 versus 2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1005 versus 62

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1042
8827
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
241
767
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4592
39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.062
116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
273.504
1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.777
9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.939
84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.881
607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1397
11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
878
3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1397
11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
878
3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
62
1005
Nom Intel UHD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark 1042 8827
PassMark - G2D Mark 241 767
Geekbench - OpenCL 4592 39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.062 116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 273.504 1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.777 9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.939 84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.881 607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1397 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 878 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2227 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1397 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 878 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2227 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 62 1005

Comparer les caractéristiques

Intel UHD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon RX 580

Essentiel

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 4.0
Nom de code Kaby Lake GT2 Polaris 20
Date de sortie 1 September 2017 18 April 2017
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1380 341
Genre Laptop Desktop
Conception Radeon RX 500 Series
Génération GCN 4th Gen
Prix de sortie (MSRP) $229
Prix maintenant $169.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) 76.21

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 1150 MHz 1340 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 300 MHz 1257 MHz
Processus de fabrication 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 24 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 185 Watt
Compte de transistor 189 million 5,700 million
Unités de Compute 36
Performance á point flottant 6.2 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 42.88 GP/s
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2304
Taux de remplissage de la texture 192.96 GTexel/s
Texture Units 144

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
HDMI
VGA

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bridgeless CrossFire
Longeur 241 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) 500 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires 1x 8-pin

Soutien API

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 2.0
Vulkan

Mémoire

RAM maximale 32 GB 8 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire 64 / 128 Bit 256 bit
Genre de mémoire LPDDR3 / DDR4 GDDR5
Mémoire partagé 1
Bande passante de la mémoire 256 GB/s
Vitesse de mémoire 8000 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready