Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 9.932
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 254.345
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.14
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 13.613
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 15.32
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 24 April 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 vs 9.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 vs 254.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 vs 1.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 vs 13.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 vs 15.32 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 vs 1397
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2227
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 vs 1397
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2227
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 2227 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4580 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 9.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 254.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 1.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 13.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 15.32 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 1502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 2167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 1502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 2167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3334 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1383 | 1386 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 612.1 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 25.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |