Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 9.932
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 versus 254.345
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 1.14
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 13.613
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 versus 15.32
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 24 April 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 9.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 versus 254.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 1.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 13.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 versus 15.32 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 797 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 versus 1397
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 2227
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 versus 1397
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 2227
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 2227 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4580 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 9.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 254.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 1.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 13.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 15.32 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 1502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 2167 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 365 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 24 April 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1383 | 1386 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,270 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 612.1 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.5 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.51 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7200 GS
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
