Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M270

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 767
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 153
  • Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 14.826
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 878 vs 527
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 2081
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 878 vs 527
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 2081
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 9 January 2014
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1045 vs 767
PassMark - G2D Mark 244 vs 153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.062 vs 14.826
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 878 vs 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2227 vs 2081
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 878 vs 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2227 vs 2081

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
  • Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6810 vs 4589
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 1397
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 1397
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 6810 vs 4589
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1747 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1747 vs 1397

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1045
767
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
244
153
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4589
6810
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.062
14.826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1397
1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
878
527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
2081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1397
1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
878
527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2227
2081
Name Intel UHD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon R7 M270
PassMark - G3D Mark 1045 767
PassMark - G2D Mark 244 153
Geekbench - OpenCL 4589 6810
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.062 14.826
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1397 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 878 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2227 2081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1397 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 878 527
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2227 2081
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 365

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 620 AMD Radeon R7 M270

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Kaby Lake GT2 Opal
Launch date 1 September 2017 9 January 2014
Place in performance rating 1384 1385
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 725 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,040 million
Floating-point performance 633.6 gflops
Texture fill rate 19.8 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type LPDDR3 / DDR4 Not Listed
Shared memory 1 0
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s

Technologies

Quick Sync
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore