Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M270
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 767
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 153
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 14.826
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 878 vs 527
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 2081
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 878 vs 527
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 2081
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 9 January 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 vs 767 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 vs 153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 vs 14.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 vs 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 vs 2081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 vs 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 vs 2081 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M270
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6810 vs 4580
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 1397
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 1397
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6810 vs 4580 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 vs 1397 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M270
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1045 | 767 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 | 153 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4580 | 6810 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 14.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 2081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 2081 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | Opal |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 9 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1383 | 1384 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |