Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 vs 1042
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 241
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 vs 4592
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 vs 27.062
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 vs 273.504
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 vs 1.777
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 19.939
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 vs 31.881
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2227
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2227
• 16.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 3337
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 515
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 9306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 2.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 69.814
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 1050

Compare specifications (specs)