Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

• 3.8x more core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 42.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 24
• 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 1042
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 241
• 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 4592
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 27.062
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 792.44 vs 273.504
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 vs 1.777
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.338 vs 19.939
• 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 vs 31.881
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 2227
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 vs 2227
• 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 162 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 6111
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 18734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 73.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 792.44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 4.888
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 35.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 200.825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 7218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 162

Compare specifications (specs)