Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 19 September 2014 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 148 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 69.3x more pipelines: 1664 vs 24
- 9.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 1042
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 241
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 4592
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 27.062
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 vs 273.504
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 vs 1.777
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 vs 19.939
- 15.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 31.881
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 1397
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2227
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 1397
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2227
- 6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 369 vs 62
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 vs 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 vs 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 vs 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 vs 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 vs 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 vs 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 vs 62 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 9640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 28498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 105.107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 8.737 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 490.688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 11499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM204 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1380 | 371 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Price now | $407.76 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 1664 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 148 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |