Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 9.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 148 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 19 September 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 148 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 4 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 69.3x plus de pipelines: 1664 versus 24
- 9.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 versus 1042
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 241
- 6.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 versus 4592
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 versus 27.062
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 versus 273.504
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 versus 1.777
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 versus 19.939
- 15.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 versus 31.881
- 8.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 2227
- 8.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 878
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 2227
- 6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 369 versus 62
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1664 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 versus 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 versus 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 versus 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 versus 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 versus 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 9640 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 766 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 28498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 105.107 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 1225.96 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 8.737 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 35.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 490.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 11499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 369 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM204 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 19 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 371 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Prix maintenant | $407.76 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1664 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 5,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Options SLI | 4x | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pins | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
