Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD FirePro D300

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD FirePro D300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D300

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 68 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 53.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 24
• 4.7x better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19872 vs 4657
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.183 vs 27.517
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1192.547 vs 354.254
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.209 vs 1.807
• 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.541 vs 20.323
• 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 242.179 vs 29.327
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6054 vs 1870
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3397 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3309
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6054 vs 1870
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3397 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D300

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 19872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 51.183
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 1192.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 5.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 78.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 242.179
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 6054
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3397
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3351

Compare specifications (specs)