Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- Around 92% better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 27 Watt
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 289
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 152
- 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 790
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 540
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1044
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1702
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 540
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1044
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1702
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 5 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 27 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 vs 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 vs 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 1702 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 160 vs 24
- 6.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 437 vs 68
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 437 vs 68 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 790 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 1702 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Caicos |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | 1491 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 27 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |