Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 7790

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 7790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 988
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2061
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 988
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2061

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7790

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 37.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 24
• 3.9x better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 vs 1237
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 vs 299
• 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 vs 4657
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 vs 27.517
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.247 vs 354.254
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 vs 1.807
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 vs 20.323
• 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 vs 29.327
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 vs 1870
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 vs 1870

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7790

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 459
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 14832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 40.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 828.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 3.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 63.284
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 217.744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 5087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2061
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 5087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2061

Compare specifications (specs)