Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus AMD Radeon HD 7790
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 7790 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 85 Watt
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 988
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 2061
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 988
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 2061
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 22 March 2013 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 85 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 2061 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7790
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 94% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 56 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 37.3x plus de pipelines: 896 versus 24
- 3.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,792 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 versus 1237
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 versus 299
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 versus 4657
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 versus 27.517
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.247 versus 354.254
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 versus 1.807
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 versus 20.323
- 7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 versus 29.327
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 versus 1870
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 versus 1870
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 56 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,792 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 versus 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 versus 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 versus 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 versus 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 versus 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 versus 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 versus 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 versus 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 versus 1870 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7790
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 7790 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 3090 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 459 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 14832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 40.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 828.247 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 3.646 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 63.284 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 217.744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 5087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 5087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2061 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | Bonaire |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 22 March 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 820 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Prix maintenant | $134.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.57 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 896 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 183 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |