Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 25.508

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• Around 78% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 vs 4657
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 354.254
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 vs 1.807
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 vs 20.323
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 vs 29.327
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 1870
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3309
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 1870
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 7787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 25.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 647.813
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 2.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 44.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 109.558
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2072
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3358

Compare specifications (specs)