Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 6.9x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 24 vs 16
• 13.7x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 347
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 194
• 8.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 538
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 8.712
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 155.638
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 0.931
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 7.36
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 vs 12.009
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 754
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1492
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2392
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 754
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1492
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• Around 86% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 350 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2392

Compare specifications (specs)