Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 24 versus 16
- 13.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 versus 347
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 194
- 8.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 538
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 8.712
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 155.638
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 0.931
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 7.36
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 12.009
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 754
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1492
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 2392
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 754
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1492
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 2392
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 14 May 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 24 versus 16 |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 versus 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 versus 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 versus 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 versus 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 2392 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Environ 86% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 350 MHz
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.0 |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 14 May 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1501 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 16 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |