Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
  • Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz
  • times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
  • Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 24 versus 16
  • 13.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
  • Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
  • 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
  • 3.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 versus 347
  • Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 versus 194
  • 8.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 538
  • 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 8.712
  • 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 versus 155.638
  • Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 0.931
  • 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 7.36
  • 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 12.009
  • 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 versus 754
  • Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 versus 1492
  • Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 2392
  • 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 versus 754
  • Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 versus 1492
  • Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 2392
Caractéristiques
Date de sortie 1 September 2017 versus 14 May 2012
Vitesse augmenté 1200 MHz versus 1050 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture 28.8 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 24 versus 16
Performance á point flottant 460.8 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Processus de fabrication 14 nm versus 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 1237 versus 347
PassMark - G2D Mark 299 versus 194
Geekbench - OpenCL 4657 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.517 versus 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.254 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.807 versus 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.323 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.327 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 versus 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 versus 2392

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

  • Environ 86% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 350 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 650 MHz versus 350 MHz

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1237
347
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
299
194
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4657
538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.517
8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
354.254
155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.807
0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20.323
7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.327
12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
2392
Nom Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark 1237 347
PassMark - G2D Mark 299 194
Geekbench - OpenCL 4657 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.517 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.254 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.807 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.323 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.327 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 68 0

Comparer les caractéristiques

Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel HD Graphics 4000

Essentiel

Architecture Generation 9.5 Generation 7.0
Nom de code Coffee Lake GT2 Ivy Bridge GT2
Date de sortie 1 September 2017 14 May 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1234 1501
Genre Desktop Laptop

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 1200 MHz 1050 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 350 MHz 650 MHz
Performance á point flottant 460.8 gflops 33.6 gflops
Processus de fabrication 14 nm 22 nm
Pipelines 24 16
Taux de remplissage de la texture 28.8 GTexel / s 4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt
Compte de transistor 189 million 1,200 million

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran No outputs No outputs

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 1.0 x16

Soutien API

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.0

Mémoire

Largeur du bus mémoire 64 / 128 Bit 64 / 128 Bit
Mémoire partagé 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync