Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 6.9x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 24 vs 16
  • 11.7x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
  • 9.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 126
  • 10x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 30
  • Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 2438
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 497
  • 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 688
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 497
  • 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 688
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 12 October 2009
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
Pipelines 24 vs 16
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1237 vs 126
PassMark - G2D Mark 299 vs 30
Geekbench - OpenCL 4657 vs 2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 vs 688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 vs 688

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

  • 4x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 350 MHz
Core clock speed 1402 MHz vs 350 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1237
126
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
299
30
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4657
2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
688
Name Intel UHD Graphics 630 NVIDIA GeForce 210
PassMark - G3D Mark 1237 126
PassMark - G2D Mark 299 30
Geekbench - OpenCL 4657 2438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 688
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 68

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 NVIDIA GeForce 210

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Tesla 2.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT2 GT218
Launch date 1 September 2017 12 October 2009
Place in performance rating 1234 1674
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $29.49
Price now $32.99
Value for money (0-100) 6.81

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 1402 MHz
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops 39.36 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 24 16
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s 4.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 30.5 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 260 million
CUDA cores 16
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Height 2.731" (6.9 cm)
Length 6.60" (16.8 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 10.1
OpenGL 4.6 3.1

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 8.0 GB / s
Memory clock speed 500 MHz
Memory type GDDR2

Technologies

Quick Sync
CUDA