Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 43 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 470
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 59
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2502
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2502
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 2 February 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops vs 187.49 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 43 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 vs 470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 vs 59 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2502 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 540 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 72 vs 24
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 4657
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 540 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 72 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8132 vs 4657 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 8132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2502 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GT215 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 2 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | 1482 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 187.49 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 43 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 175 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.28 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |