Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
• Around 71% better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 383
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 158
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 1571
• 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 4.046
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 83.907
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 0.371
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 6.791
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 vs 17.41
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 614
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1162
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1683
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 614
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1162
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1683

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

• 2x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 383
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 158
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 1571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 4.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 83.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 0.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 6.791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 17.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1683

Compare specifications (specs)