Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 9.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 140 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 40x more pipelines: 960 vs 24
• 4.3x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 1237
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 299
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 4657
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 27.517
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 354.254
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 1.807
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 20.323
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 29.327
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1596
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3309
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1596
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3309
• 19.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 4017
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 487
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 11364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3365
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 1307

Compare specifications (specs)