Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 3x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1237
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 299
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 4657
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 27.517
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 354.254
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.807
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 20.323
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 29.327
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3309
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3309
• Around 72% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 117 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 117

Compare specifications (specs)