Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 47 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• 3.6x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• 4.1x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 1237
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 299
• 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 4657
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 27.517
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 354.254
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 1.807
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 20.323
• 8.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 29.327
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 vs 3309
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 vs 3309
• 23.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 4500
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 590
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 1591

Compare specifications (specs)