Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and NVIDIA GeForce 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 1560x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 vs 490
  • 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 114
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5967 vs 2789
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2429 vs 1195
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 1447
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2429 vs 1195
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 1447
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 21 March 2015
Texture fill rate 15.60 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1573 vs 490
PassMark - G2D Mark 412 vs 114
Geekbench - OpenCL 5967 vs 2789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2429 vs 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5221 vs 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2429 vs 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5221 vs 1447

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

  • 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3309
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3309
  • Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 847 vs 603
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 vs 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 vs 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 847 vs 603

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1573
490
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
412
114
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5967
2789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2429
1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5221
1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2429
1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5221
1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
603
847
Name Intel UHD Graphics 730 NVIDIA GeForce 820M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1573 490
PassMark - G2D Mark 412 114
Geekbench - OpenCL 5967 2789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2429 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5221 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2429 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5221 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 603 847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.768

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 730 NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 Kepler
Code name Rocket Lake GT1 GK107
Launch date 2021 21 March 2015
Place in performance rating 633 1444
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz
Compute units 24
Core clock speed 300 MHz 810 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 499.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines 192 96
Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 15.60 GTexel/s 10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops
Transistor count 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 2.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1802 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers