Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and NVIDIA GeForce 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 1560x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 vs 490
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 114
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5967 vs 2789
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2429 vs 1195
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 1447
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2429 vs 1195
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 1447
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 21 March 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 vs 490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 vs 2789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 vs 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 vs 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 1447 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3309
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3309
- Around 40% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 847 vs 603
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 vs 603 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA GeForce 820M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 2789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 1195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GK107 |
Launch date | 2021 | 21 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 633 | 1444 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |