Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3715
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3715
- Around 71% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 603 vs 352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 22 Nov 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 3715 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 vs 352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 8.8x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 15.60 GTexel/s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 1280 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 vs 1573
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 412
- 9.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 5967
- 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3309
- 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 138.0 GTexel/s vs 15.60 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10180 vs 1573 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 412 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55838 vs 5967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3309 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 55838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | TU116 |
Launch date | 2021 | 22 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 633 | 283 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 192 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |