Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3356
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 2 Sep 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2687 vs 1736
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 354 vs 348
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12204 vs 6684
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3219
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2687 vs 1736 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 vs 348 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12204 vs 6684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1736 | 2687 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | 354 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6684 | 12204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 5609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1138.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.829 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 12.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Tiger Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 2021 | 2 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 596 | 621 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | 211.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | 1.690 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | 844.8 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | 13.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 52.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Width | IGP |