Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 589.2x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 35.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1736 vs 1572
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2899 vs 2879
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3322
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 vs 2879
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3322
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 14 May 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 35.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1736 vs 1572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 vs 2879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 vs 2879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3322 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 736 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 288 vs 256
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 447 vs 348
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27378 vs 6684
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3372 vs 3219
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3372 vs 3219
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 736 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 288 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 447 vs 348 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27378 vs 6684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3372 vs 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3372 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1736 | 1572 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | 447 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6684 | 27378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 2879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 2879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3322 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 14 May 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 596 | 600 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 288 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 35.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 847.9 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 91.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3828 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 750 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945A
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAT1000
