Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 351 vs 229
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3219 vs 2784
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3352
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3219 vs 2784
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 vs 229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 vs 2784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 vs 2784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1594 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2434 vs 1726
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10699 vs 6483
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 2899
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 2899
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2434 vs 1726 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10699 vs 6483 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 vs 2899 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 | 2434 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 | 229 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6483 | 10699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 3808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 2784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 3808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 2784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GP108 |
Launch date | 2021 | 10 Feb 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 769 | 770 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1594 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | 1,224 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | 25.50 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 38.26 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 1800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |