Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA Quadro P520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 120x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 1800 million
  • Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 239
  • 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 2295
  • 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 2295
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 27 May 2019
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 1800 million
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 353 vs 239
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11068 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11068 vs 2295

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

  • 4.3x more core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
  • Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2092 vs 1734
  • Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7859 vs 6455
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2899
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 3219
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2899
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 3219
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.89 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
Pipelines 384 vs 256
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2092 vs 1734
Geekbench - OpenCL 7859 vs 6455
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3527 vs 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3566 vs 3219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3527 vs 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3566 vs 3219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P520

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1734
2092
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
353
239
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6455
7859
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2899
3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3219
3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11068
2295
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2899
3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3219
3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11068
2295
Name Intel UHD Graphics 750 NVIDIA Quadro P520
PassMark - G3D Mark 1734 2092
PassMark - G2D Mark 353 239
Geekbench - OpenCL 6455 7859
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 35.179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 543.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2899 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3219 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11068 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2899 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3219 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11068 2295
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 641

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 750 NVIDIA Quadro P520

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 Pascal
Code name Rocket Lake GT1 GP108
Launch date 2021 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 768 770
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 1493 MHz
Compute units 32
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1303 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) 23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) 11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 665.6 GFLOPS 764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 256 384
Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s 23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 20.80 GTexel/s 23.89 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 1800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Multi monitor support

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
Vulkan

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.10 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Multi Monitor