Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA Quadro P520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 120x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 1800 million
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 239
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 2295
- 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 2295
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 1800 million |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 vs 239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 2295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 2295 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2092 vs 1734
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7859 vs 6455
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2899
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 3219
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2899
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2092 vs 1734 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7859 vs 6455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA Quadro P520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1734 | 2092 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 353 | 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6455 | 7859 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 3527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 2295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 3527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 2295 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GP108 |
Launch date | 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 768 | 770 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | 23.89 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | 11.94 GFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | 764.4 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | 23.89 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 23.89 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 1800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor |