Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1887 vs 1435
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1887 vs 1435
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3300
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3300
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 22 April 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 vs 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 vs 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3300 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 18x more pipelines: 576 vs 32
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 3505
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 3505
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 576 vs 32 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 vs 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 vs 3505 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 1435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3531 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3531 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3300 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1877 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.664 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Kepler |
| Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 22 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 884 | 964 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 824 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 576 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 949.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.55 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 147 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
