Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 4.1x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 7 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 192 vs 160
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 11.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.935 vs 2.021
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 337.37 vs 104.327
  • 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.338 vs 0.239
  • 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.62 vs 5.628
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.757 vs 23.365
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 293 vs 174
  • 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1493 vs 263
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Texture fill rate 28.80 vs 7 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 160
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.935 vs 2.021
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 337.37 vs 104.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.338 vs 0.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.62 vs 5.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.757 vs 23.365
PassMark - G2D Mark 293 vs 174
PassMark - G3D Mark 1493 vs 263

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.935
2.021
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337.37
104.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.338
0.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.62
5.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.757
23.365
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
293
174
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1493
263
Name Intel UHD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.935 2.021
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 337.37 104.327
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.338 0.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.62 5.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.757 23.365
PassMark - G2D Mark 293 174
PassMark - G3D Mark 1493 263
Geekbench - OpenCL 872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 672
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1078
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 672
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1078
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2093

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 TeraScale 2
Code name Comet Lake GT2 Caicos
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 23 July 2013
Place in performance rating 1167 1541
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 160
Texture fill rate 28.80 7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt
Core clock speed 875 MHz
Floating-point performance 280.0 gflops
Transistor count 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3