Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 7 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 192 vs 160
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 11.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.935 vs 2.021
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 337.37 vs 104.327
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.338 vs 0.239
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.62 vs 5.628
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.757 vs 23.365
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 293 vs 174
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1493 vs 263
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 vs 7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 160 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 vs 2.021 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 vs 104.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 vs 0.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 vs 5.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 vs 23.365 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 vs 174 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 vs 263 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 | 2.021 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 | 104.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 | 0.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 | 5.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 | 23.365 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 | 174 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 | 263 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 872 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1078 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1167 | 1541 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |

