Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8670M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 775 MHz
  • Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 19.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.912 vs 7.005
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.921 vs 144.131
  • Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.337 vs 0.952
  • Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.611 vs 17.551
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1491 vs 520
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 1 March 2013
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 775 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.80 vs 19.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.912 vs 7.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 335.921 vs 144.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.337 vs 0.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.611 vs 17.551
PassMark - G3D Mark 1491 vs 520

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M

  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 vs 29.496
  • Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 287
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 71.696 vs 29.496
PassMark - G2D Mark 488 vs 287

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8670M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.912
7.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
335.921
144.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.337
0.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.611
17.551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.496
71.696
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
287
488
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1491
520
Name Intel UHD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8670M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.912 7.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 335.921 144.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.337 0.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.611 17.551
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.496 71.696
PassMark - G2D Mark 287 488
PassMark - G3D Mark 1491 520
Geekbench - OpenCL 5532
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1783
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2270
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1783
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2270

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8670M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Comet Lake GT2 Mars
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 1 March 2013
Place in performance rating 1172 1175
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 775 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 384
Texture fill rate 28.80 19.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 775 MHz
Floating-point performance 633.6 gflops
Transistor count 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.1 11
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0