Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 8670M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 8670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.912 vs 7.005
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.921 vs 144.131
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.337 vs 0.952
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.611 vs 17.551
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1491 vs 520
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 1 March 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.912 vs 7.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.921 vs 144.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.337 vs 0.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.611 vs 17.551 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1491 vs 520 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 vs 29.496
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 vs 287
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 vs 29.496 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 vs 287 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.912 | 7.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.921 | 144.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.337 | 0.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.611 | 17.551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.496 | 71.696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 | 488 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1491 | 520 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | Mars |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1172 | 1175 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 775 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 |