Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics

NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
2.9x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 10 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.935 vs 7.765
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 337.37 vs 161.305
Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.338 vs 0.686
Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.62 vs 14.257
Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.757 vs 22.768
2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 293 vs 114
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1493 vs 490

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 Aug 2019 vs 21 March 2015
Texture fill rate	28.80 vs 10 GTexel / s
Pipelines	192 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.935 vs 7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	337.37 vs 161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.338 vs 0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.62 vs 14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	29.757 vs 22.768
PassMark - G2D Mark	293 vs 114
PassMark - G3D Mark	1493 vs 490

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

22.935

7.765

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

337.37

161.305

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.338

0.686

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.62

14.257

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.757

22.768

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

293

114

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1493

490

Name	Intel UHD Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce 820M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	22.935	7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	337.37	161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.338	0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.62	14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	29.757	22.768
PassMark - G2D Mark	293	114
PassMark - G3D Mark	1493	490
Geekbench - OpenCL		2789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		847

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Kepler
Code name	Comet Lake GT2	GK107
Launch date	21 Aug 2019	21 March 2015
Place in performance rating	1167	1444
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	96
Texture fill rate	28.80	10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Core clock speed		810 MHz
Floating-point performance		240.0 gflops
Transistor count		1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory clock speed		1802 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers