Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel UHD Graphics

NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 11 month(s) later
4.3x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 6.7 billion / sec
2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 23 Watt
5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 vs 4.184
Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 vs 172.058
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 vs 0.459
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.728 vs 8.145
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.67 vs 13.944
Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 171
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1478 vs 528

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 Aug 2019 vs 3 September 2010
Texture fill rate	28.80 vs 6.7 billion / sec
Pipelines	192 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 23 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.059 vs 4.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.603 vs 172.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.345 vs 0.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.728 vs 8.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	28.67 vs 13.944
PassMark - G2D Mark	269 vs 171
PassMark - G3D Mark	1478 vs 528

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.059

4.184

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

313.603

172.058

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.345

0.459

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.728

8.145

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

28.67

13.944

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

269

171

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1478

528

Name	Intel UHD Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.059	4.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.603	172.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.345	0.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.728	8.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	28.67	13.944
PassMark - G2D Mark	269	171
PassMark - G3D Mark	1478	528
Geekbench - OpenCL		1860
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		690

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Fermi
Code name	Comet Lake GT2	GF108
Launch date	21 Aug 2019	3 September 2010
Place in performance rating	1186	1569
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	96
Texture fill rate	28.80	6.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	23 Watt
Core clock speed		1120 MHz
CUDA cores		96
Floating-point performance		215.04 gflops
Transistor count		585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.1	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		800 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus