Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 753 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 192 vs 144
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 vs 5.332
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 vs 205.545
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 vs 0.635
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.728 vs 10.932
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.67 vs 22.728
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 169
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1478 vs 562
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 22 March 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 753 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 144 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 vs 5.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 vs 205.545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 vs 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 vs 10.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.67 vs 22.728 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 vs 169 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 vs 562 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 | 5.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 | 205.545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 | 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 | 10.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.67 | 22.728 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | 169 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 | 562 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2499 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | GF116 |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1186 | 1458 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 753 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 144 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |