Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.935 vs 4.418
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 337.37 vs 142.734
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.338 vs 0.395
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.62 vs 8.158
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.757 vs 17.317
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 293 vs 208
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1493 vs 631
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 29 September 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 vs 4.418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 vs 142.734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 vs 0.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 vs 8.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 vs 17.317 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 vs 208 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 vs 631 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 | 4.418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 | 142.734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 | 0.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 | 8.158 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 | 17.317 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 | 208 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 | 631 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2224 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | GK208B |
| Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 29 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1167 | 1590 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | |
| Price now | $54.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 12.75 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB or 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||

