Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 967 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.935 vs 15.67
  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 337.37 vs 251.09
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.338 vs 1.144
  • Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.62 vs 10.872
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.757 vs 13.423
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 293 vs 244
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1493 vs 1330
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 9 January 2013
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 967 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.935 vs 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 337.37 vs 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.338 vs 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.62 vs 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.757 vs 13.423
PassMark - G2D Mark 293 vs 244
PassMark - G3D Mark 1493 vs 1330

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

  • Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 28.80
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
Texture fill rate 30.94 GTexel / s vs 28.80
Pipelines 384 vs 192

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.935
15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337.37
251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.338
1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.62
10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.757
13.423
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
293
244
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1493
1330
Name Intel UHD Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.935 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 337.37 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.338 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.62 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.757 13.423
PassMark - G2D Mark 293 244
PassMark - G3D Mark 1493 1330
Geekbench - OpenCL 4267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 461

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Kepler
Code name Comet Lake GT2 GK107
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 9 January 2013
Place in performance rating 1167 1141
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 967 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 384
Texture fill rate 28.80 30.94 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt
Core clock speed 941 MHz
Floating-point performance 742.7 gflops
Transistor count 1,270 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.1 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus