Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 18 February 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 28.80
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 22.935
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 337.37
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.338
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 19.62
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 29.757
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 293
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1493
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s vs 28.80 |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 22.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 337.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 1.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 19.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 29.757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 293 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 1493 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 | 26.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 | 133.458 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 | 521 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 | 3901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | GM107 |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1167 | 707 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |