Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 25 June 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 28.80
- 6x more pipelines: 1152 vs 192
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.505 vs 22.935
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 337.37
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.09 vs 1.338
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.457 vs 19.62
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.186 vs 29.757
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 293
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 1493
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 28.80 |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 vs 22.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 337.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 vs 1.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 vs 19.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 vs 29.757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 293 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 1493 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.935 | 37.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 337.37 | 864.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.338 | 3.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.62 | 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.757 | 84.186 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 293 | 532 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1493 | 4803 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | GK104 |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 25 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1167 | 576 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $249.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 94.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1152 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |