Intel UHD Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1178 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 9.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 148 Watt
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1178 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 148 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

  • 3.8x more texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 28.80
  • 8.7x more pipelines: 1664 vs 192
  • 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 22.935
  • 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 vs 337.37
  • 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 vs 1.338
  • Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 vs 19.62
  • 16.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 29.757
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 293
  • 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 1493
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 109 billion / sec vs 28.80
Pipelines 1664 vs 192
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.107 vs 22.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1225.96 vs 337.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.737 vs 1.338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.714 vs 19.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 490.688 vs 29.757
PassMark - G2D Mark 766 vs 293
PassMark - G3D Mark 9640 vs 1493

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.935
105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337.37
1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.338
8.737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.62
35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.757
490.688
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
293
766
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1493
9640
Name Intel UHD Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.935 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 337.37 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.338 8.737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.62 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.757 490.688
PassMark - G2D Mark 293 766
PassMark - G3D Mark 1493 9640
Geekbench - OpenCL 28498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 369

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Comet Lake GT2 GM204
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 19 September 2014
Place in performance rating 1167 371
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $329
Price now $407.76
Value for money (0-100) 28.59

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1178 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 1664
Texture fill rate 28.80 109 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 148 Watt
Core clock speed 1050 MHz
CUDA cores 1664
Floating-point performance 3,920 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C
Transistor count 5,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
SLI options 4x
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pins

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround