NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 6912 vs 4608
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200738 vs 138072
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 27823 vs 3707
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 27823 vs 3707
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 51880 vs 3353
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 51880 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 May 2020 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Pipelines | 6912 vs 4608 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200738 vs 138072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 280 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 11.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective)
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 21006
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 21006
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 21006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 21006 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200738 | 138072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21006 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21006 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20362 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 840 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3794 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA100 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2020 | 18 December 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 7 | 109 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.49 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6912 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 225.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 54200 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 40 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 1555 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 5120 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB with others
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
NVIDIARTX 6000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7900
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
