NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 50HX and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 50HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 6865.7x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 43.2 billion / sec
- 28x more pipelines: 3584 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 65 nm
- 20x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 59% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1100 MHz
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 vs 28 March 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 43.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1100 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1688 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 50HX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Name | NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51164 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 769 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
Code name | TU102 | G92 |
Launch date | 24 Jun 2021 | 28 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 416 | 414 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1688 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 128 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 43.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 18600 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Width | 116 mm, 4.6 inches | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 560.0 GB/s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |