NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 30% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • 3x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
  • 3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
  • 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 238 Watt
  • Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 471
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 July 2014 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed 745 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 448
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt vs 238 Watt
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 539 vs 471

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070

  • 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
  • 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2840 vs 912
  • 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3245 vs 833
  • 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3245 vs 833
  • Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2128
  • Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2128
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2660
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2660
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2840 vs 912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3245 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3245 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 2660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 2660

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
912
2840
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
539
471
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
833
3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
833
3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2128
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2128
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2660
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2660
3351
Name NVIDIA GRID K220Q NVIDIA Tesla C2070
PassMark - G3D Mark 912 2840
PassMark - G2D Mark 539 471
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 833 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 833 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2128 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2128 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2660 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2660 3351
Geekbench - OpenCL 9716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 908.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 43.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.344

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GRID K220Q NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK104 GF100
Launch date 2 July 2014 25 July 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $469
Place in performance rating 753 756
Type Workstation Workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 745 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1536 448
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s 32.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 238 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 144.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 3000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5