NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 471
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2014 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 vs 471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2840 vs 912
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3245 vs 833
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3245 vs 833
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2128
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2128
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2660
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2660
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2840 vs 912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3245 vs 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3245 vs 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2660 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K220Q | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 912 | 2840 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 | 471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 833 | 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 833 | 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2128 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2128 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2660 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2660 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9716 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K220Q | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Launch date | 2 July 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | |
Place in performance rating | 753 | 756 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |