NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 2 July 2014 vs 8 January 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 118.4 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3583 vs 2128
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3583 vs 2128
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 2660
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 2660
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops vs 2,289 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3583 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3583 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 2660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 2660 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K220Q | AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 912 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 833 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 833 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2128 | 3583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2128 | 3583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2660 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2660 | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K220Q | AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 2 July 2014 | 8 January 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | |
Place in performance rating | 753 | 755 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 274 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 264.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |