NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K260Q and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 93.6 GTexel / s
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 2810
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 2810
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 19 November 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 93.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 vs 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 vs 2810 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 2,995 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4470 vs 2949
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 361
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3264 vs 1898
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3264 vs 1898
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1954
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1954
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops vs 2,289 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4470 vs 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 vs 361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3264 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3264 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 1954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 1954 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 | 4470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 661 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1898 | 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1898 | 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1954 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1954 | 3354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1230.47 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.371 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 345.793 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 19 November 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $937 | $270 |
Place in performance rating | 547 | 548 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 93.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 192.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |