NVIDIA GRID K340 vs AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K340 and AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K340
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 69.4x more texture fill rate: 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 4x 384 vs 160
- 11.8x better floating-point performance: 4x 729.6 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4x 1 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.822 vs 2.342
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 411.582 vs 121.217
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.116 vs 0.275
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.441 vs 6.14
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.699 vs 23.947
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 8 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4x 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 4x 729.6 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4x 1 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.822 vs 2.342 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 411.582 vs 121.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.116 vs 0.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.441 vs 6.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.699 vs 23.947 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K340
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K340 | AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.822 | 2.342 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 411.582 | 121.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.116 | 0.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.441 | 6.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.699 | 23.947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 166 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 247 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 785 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K340 | AMD Radeon HD 8470 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Caicos |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 1584 | 1586 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4x 729.6 gflops | 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 4x 384 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 4x 30.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 6.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4x 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 4x 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4x 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |