NVIDIA GRID K520 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and ATI Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 437.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 38.4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 80
- 51x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1310 MHz
- 14.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 236
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 558
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 558
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 30 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1310 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 vs 236 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 558 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4550
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 160
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 vs 160 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K520 | ATI Radeon HD 4550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 429 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 558 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K520 | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | RV710 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 30 September 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | $59 |
Place in performance rating | 769 | 766 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 10.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1310 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |