NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1013 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 18 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 975 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 1013 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 52.24 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1,280 vs 640
- Around 49% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 1,672 gflops
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 vs 228
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6149 vs 1756
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 52.24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1,280 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 1,672 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 vs 228 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6149 vs 1756 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | 412 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1756 | 6149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 68.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.464 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 572 | 569 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | 1013 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 975 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1,280 |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |