NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 and AMD Radeon R7 M260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 83% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 715 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 3x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 6 December 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
Name | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon R7 M260X |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 997 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Opal |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 6 December 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1217 | 1219 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | 715 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |