NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 and AMD Radeon R9 M375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1015 MHz
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 1,299 gflops
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 29.048
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 272.547
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 2.024
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 142.872
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 1015 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 1,299 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 vs 29.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 vs 272.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 vs 2.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 vs 142.872 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 30.991
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.994 vs 30.991 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 | 29.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 | 272.547 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 | 2.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 | 35.994 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 | 142.872 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 973 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 161 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10289 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2112 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2227 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2112 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon R9 M375 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Tropo |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1217 | 1220 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 40.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 with others
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
