NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q

AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 29% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 723 MHz
Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Around 63% better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5203 vs 5150
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3526 vs 2045
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3526 vs 2045
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3144
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3144

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 August 2015 vs 23 November 2014
Core clock speed	930 MHz vs 723 MHz
Texture fill rate	151.0 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	4,833 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5203 vs 5150
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3526 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3526 vs 2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3144
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3144

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X

2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 832 vs 311

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	832 vs 311

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5203

5150

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

311

832

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3526

2045

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3526

2045

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3144

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3144

Name	NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q	AMD Radeon R9 M295X
PassMark - G3D Mark	5203	5150
PassMark - G2D Mark	311	832
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5460
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5460
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3526	2045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3526	2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3144
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3144
Geekbench - OpenCL		26899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		386.418

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q	AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	GM204	Amethyst
Launch date	30 August 2015	23 November 2014
Place in performance rating	491	494
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1180 MHz
Core clock speed	930 MHz	723 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,833 gflops	2,961 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2048	2048
Texture fill rate	151.0 GTexel / s	92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	5,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	Not Listed
Shared memory		0
Technologies
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore